Title: Waiting for Godot
Author: Samuel Beckett
Copyright Date: 1953
My Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars ( ok )
Back-Cover Description
A seminal work of twentieth-century drama, Waiting for Godot was Samuel Beckett's first professionally produced play. It opened in Paris in 1953 at the tiny Left Back Theatre de Babylone, and has since become a cornerstone of twentieth-century theater.
The story line evolves around two seemingly homeless men waiting for someone --or something-- named Godot. Vladimir and Estragon wait near a tree on a barren stretch of road, inhabiting a drama spun from their own consciousness. The result is a comical wordplay of poetry, dreamscapes, and nonsense, which has been interpreted as a somber summation of mankind's inexhaustible search for meaning. Beckett's language pioneered an expressionistic minimalism that captured the existentialism of post-World War II Europe. His play remains one of the most magical and beautiful allegories of out time.
My Thoughts
If you want an example of a play in the 'Theater of the Absurd' style, look no further than Waiting for Godot. It is a very simple play; just two guys hanging around a tree waiting for Godot to arrive. Their conversations are playful, light, sometimes funny. But within the playfulness you can see the social commentary in between the lines. The biggest problem I had with this play is that the characters were SO absurd that I couldn't care for them. These men had absolutely no short term memory and their dialog was based on this instantaneous ignorance. They just kept going around in circles. Every now and then, a few other characters would enter the scene to break the circle in their own weird way but even they don't remember events that occurred the previous day. I couldn't take the absurdity and apply it to humanity and therefore the social commentary was lost on me.
This isn't to say I wasn't entertained by the dialog, I just couldn't get everything Samuel Beckett wanted me to get out of it. I saw it more as a literary Abbott and Costello routine.
It is obviously better to see a play acted out on stage with good actors; but if the play is good, reading it can be a somewhat adequate substitute. Shakespeare comes to mind. I think Waiting for Godot needs to be seen to be truly appreciated.
Wednesday, September 28, 2011
Tuesday, September 27, 2011
BOOK REPORT: The Things They Carried by Tim O'Brien
Title: The Things They Carried
Author: Tim O'Brien
Copyright Date: 1990
My Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars ( good read)
Back-Cover Description
They carried malaria tablets, love letters, 28-pound mine detectors, dope, illustrated Bibles, each other. And, if they made it home alive, they carried unrelenting images of a nightmarish war that history is only beginning to absorb. Since its first publication, The Things They Carried has become an unparalleled Vietnam testament, a classic work of American literature, and a profound study of men at war that illuminates the capacity, and the limits, of the human heart and soul.
My Thoughts
The Things They Carried is a collection of short stories that tell of the author's time in Vietnam. The odd thing about them is that they are fictional, but told as a direct memoir. Throughout the book, Tim O'Brien addresses the reader directly to talk about why he writes fictional stories about his experience during the war. He says that sometimes fiction is more truthful than the real thing.
While this was a good book, The Things They Carried lacked the cohesion of the other war books I've read. As I mentioned above, the author jumps back and forth between addressing the reader directly and addressing his memories. Jumping back and forth between the two breaks up the flow of the book at times and seems redundant in certain occasions. While most of the stories have a common thread that follows the natural passage of time in the war, you can tell that some of the stories were composed as separate entities, probably for different periodicals where one can't assume that the other ones have already been read.
Like all good war stories, the reader is closely tied to the horrors, tension, boredom, solitude and camaraderie of war. The stories revolve around the friendships formed and lost, and the soul searching which takes place everyday in a war zone. The stories also touch on how a soldiers life is affected when returning from active combat; how you are never the same when you experience those horrors first hand.
One of the more powerful stories for me actually takes place before Vietnam. It is about the author as a young man in a small Wisconsin town when he gets the dreaded draft letter. He is forced to choose between possibly dying in a war that he didn't believe in and disappointing his family and community by running away across the Canadian border. I honestly don't know what I would have done in his situation and I am glad I didn't have to make that choice. I also hope that Sims doesn't have to make it either when he gets to be draft age.
I think I would have enjoyed it more not reading it cover to cover but by treating The Things They Carried as a magazine and spaced the readings out over a few months. Each story is well written and deserves to be read in its own time.
Author: Tim O'Brien
Copyright Date: 1990
My Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars ( good read)
Back-Cover Description
They carried malaria tablets, love letters, 28-pound mine detectors, dope, illustrated Bibles, each other. And, if they made it home alive, they carried unrelenting images of a nightmarish war that history is only beginning to absorb. Since its first publication, The Things They Carried has become an unparalleled Vietnam testament, a classic work of American literature, and a profound study of men at war that illuminates the capacity, and the limits, of the human heart and soul.
My Thoughts
The Things They Carried is a collection of short stories that tell of the author's time in Vietnam. The odd thing about them is that they are fictional, but told as a direct memoir. Throughout the book, Tim O'Brien addresses the reader directly to talk about why he writes fictional stories about his experience during the war. He says that sometimes fiction is more truthful than the real thing.
While this was a good book, The Things They Carried lacked the cohesion of the other war books I've read. As I mentioned above, the author jumps back and forth between addressing the reader directly and addressing his memories. Jumping back and forth between the two breaks up the flow of the book at times and seems redundant in certain occasions. While most of the stories have a common thread that follows the natural passage of time in the war, you can tell that some of the stories were composed as separate entities, probably for different periodicals where one can't assume that the other ones have already been read.
Like all good war stories, the reader is closely tied to the horrors, tension, boredom, solitude and camaraderie of war. The stories revolve around the friendships formed and lost, and the soul searching which takes place everyday in a war zone. The stories also touch on how a soldiers life is affected when returning from active combat; how you are never the same when you experience those horrors first hand.
One of the more powerful stories for me actually takes place before Vietnam. It is about the author as a young man in a small Wisconsin town when he gets the dreaded draft letter. He is forced to choose between possibly dying in a war that he didn't believe in and disappointing his family and community by running away across the Canadian border. I honestly don't know what I would have done in his situation and I am glad I didn't have to make that choice. I also hope that Sims doesn't have to make it either when he gets to be draft age.
I think I would have enjoyed it more not reading it cover to cover but by treating The Things They Carried as a magazine and spaced the readings out over a few months. Each story is well written and deserves to be read in its own time.
Thursday, August 25, 2011
BOOK REPORT: At Swim-Two-Birds by Flann O'Brien
Title: At Swim-Two-Birds
Author: Flann O'Brien
(aka Brian O'Nolan)
Copyright Date: 1939
My Rating: 2 out of 5 stars (over my head)
Backcover Description
Along with one or two books by James Joyce, Flann O'Brien's At Swim-Two-Birds is the most famous (and infamous) of Irish novels published in the twentieth century.
A wildly comic send-up of Irish literature and culture, At Swim-Two-Birds is the story of a young, lazy and frequently drunk Irish college student who lives with his curmudgeonly uncle in Dublin. When not in bed (where he seems to spend most of his time) or reading, he is composing a mischief-filled novel about Dermont Trellis, a second-rate author whose characters ultimately rebel against him and seek vengeance. From drugging him as he sleeps to dropping the ceiling on his head, these figures of Irish myth make Trellis pay dearly for his bad writing.
Hilariously funny and inventive, At Swim-Two-Birds has influenced generations of writers, opening up new possibilities for what can be done in fiction. It is a true masterpiece of Irish literature
My Thoughts
I was really excited about reading this book. It had all of the elements that, when used properly, can make for a really interesting read. It had a very compelling structure (it is a great example of meta-fiction); it was portrayed as wildly comic, and it was on several lists of recommended books. Unfortunately, most of the humor was above my head, buried deep inside stories pulled from Irish folklore of which I was totally ignorant.
The structure of the book is great in theory. Our unnamed narrator is a lazy college student who is writing a novel when not at a pub with his friends or sleeping. His novel is about a lazy man, Dermont Trellis, who sits in bed all day writing bad novels. The characters he creates are just like real actors in that they play the role outlined in the script and when not a scene, they hang out like normal people do. There are some American cowboys, there are several female leads, a few villains, an Irish version of Puck from a Midsummer Night's Dream, and Finn McCool (Finn is a warrior of Ireland from long ago which folklore has turned into more hyperbole than human.), among others. Some of characters fall in love, they play cards together, and otherwise sit around lamenting the work they must perform at the behest of Dermont. These characters get so fed up with the bad writing that they start to find ways to keep him asleep so they don't have worry about him writing. Of course everything escalates to the point of the cast writing their own book making Dermont the actor in a play in which his character is dragged through a gauntlet of painful tortures. It sounds pretty neat, huh? Flann O'Brien does an excellent job making it easy to keep track of all of the nested layers, but as you will see below the content portrayed within these layers was just too foreign to me.
Every time I told someone about this book, the first question was, "What does the title mean?" Swim-Two-Birds is a ford on the River Shannon in Ireland where one of the mythical characters, King Sweeney, visits briefly. This is the same ford that St. Patrick used to cross the river Shannon. I don't know why it was important for St. Patrick to cross at this ford, but it is one of its claims to fame.
For those with intimate knowledge of Irish folklore, you know that King Sweeney, also known as "Mad Sweeney" is a Irish king of yore that was cursed by a bishop after Sweeney tried to kill him when the church bells woke him up one morning. This curse turned Sweeney into an insane man-bird flying around all of Ireland for years until he was finally forgiven. Then he was killed by a spear. Please, go ahead and read those sentences again. This is just the beginning of how over-my-head this novel was. I looked up Mad King Sweeney on Wikipedia just to get a context of the story being told but never really understood *why* it was being told.
After a while I stopped trying to dig up every reference to Irish folklore and just pushed through it. Most of the humor was lost on me and I found myself unable to read the book for longer than twenty or thirty minutes before I would compulsively (sometimes mid-sentence) play a game on my phone, or just go to sleep.
At Swim-Two-Birds also changes style throughout the book. I counted at least seven distinct writing styles and there were probably more that I just didn't notice. These styles are meant to parody other famous Irish novels and folktales. Unfortunately for me, I haven't read any of the source materials and this layer was lost on me. I read several reviews of the book and the consensus was that if you are intimately familiar with these stories you can really see Flann's genius come through. Oh, well. I guess I need to take their word for it.
I was really hoping that I would like this book. But, my ignorance of the minutiae of Irish folklore and literature kept me from completely immersing myself in the story. I wouldn't recommend this book to anyone unless they could prove to me that they are very familiar with Irish literature.
Author: Flann O'Brien
(aka Brian O'Nolan)
Copyright Date: 1939
My Rating: 2 out of 5 stars (over my head)
Backcover Description
Along with one or two books by James Joyce, Flann O'Brien's At Swim-Two-Birds is the most famous (and infamous) of Irish novels published in the twentieth century.
A wildly comic send-up of Irish literature and culture, At Swim-Two-Birds is the story of a young, lazy and frequently drunk Irish college student who lives with his curmudgeonly uncle in Dublin. When not in bed (where he seems to spend most of his time) or reading, he is composing a mischief-filled novel about Dermont Trellis, a second-rate author whose characters ultimately rebel against him and seek vengeance. From drugging him as he sleeps to dropping the ceiling on his head, these figures of Irish myth make Trellis pay dearly for his bad writing.
Hilariously funny and inventive, At Swim-Two-Birds has influenced generations of writers, opening up new possibilities for what can be done in fiction. It is a true masterpiece of Irish literature
My Thoughts
I was really excited about reading this book. It had all of the elements that, when used properly, can make for a really interesting read. It had a very compelling structure (it is a great example of meta-fiction); it was portrayed as wildly comic, and it was on several lists of recommended books. Unfortunately, most of the humor was above my head, buried deep inside stories pulled from Irish folklore of which I was totally ignorant.
The structure of the book is great in theory. Our unnamed narrator is a lazy college student who is writing a novel when not at a pub with his friends or sleeping. His novel is about a lazy man, Dermont Trellis, who sits in bed all day writing bad novels. The characters he creates are just like real actors in that they play the role outlined in the script and when not a scene, they hang out like normal people do. There are some American cowboys, there are several female leads, a few villains, an Irish version of Puck from a Midsummer Night's Dream, and Finn McCool (Finn is a warrior of Ireland from long ago which folklore has turned into more hyperbole than human.), among others. Some of characters fall in love, they play cards together, and otherwise sit around lamenting the work they must perform at the behest of Dermont. These characters get so fed up with the bad writing that they start to find ways to keep him asleep so they don't have worry about him writing. Of course everything escalates to the point of the cast writing their own book making Dermont the actor in a play in which his character is dragged through a gauntlet of painful tortures. It sounds pretty neat, huh? Flann O'Brien does an excellent job making it easy to keep track of all of the nested layers, but as you will see below the content portrayed within these layers was just too foreign to me.
Every time I told someone about this book, the first question was, "What does the title mean?" Swim-Two-Birds is a ford on the River Shannon in Ireland where one of the mythical characters, King Sweeney, visits briefly. This is the same ford that St. Patrick used to cross the river Shannon. I don't know why it was important for St. Patrick to cross at this ford, but it is one of its claims to fame.
For those with intimate knowledge of Irish folklore, you know that King Sweeney, also known as "Mad Sweeney" is a Irish king of yore that was cursed by a bishop after Sweeney tried to kill him when the church bells woke him up one morning. This curse turned Sweeney into an insane man-bird flying around all of Ireland for years until he was finally forgiven. Then he was killed by a spear. Please, go ahead and read those sentences again. This is just the beginning of how over-my-head this novel was. I looked up Mad King Sweeney on Wikipedia just to get a context of the story being told but never really understood *why* it was being told.
After a while I stopped trying to dig up every reference to Irish folklore and just pushed through it. Most of the humor was lost on me and I found myself unable to read the book for longer than twenty or thirty minutes before I would compulsively (sometimes mid-sentence) play a game on my phone, or just go to sleep.
At Swim-Two-Birds also changes style throughout the book. I counted at least seven distinct writing styles and there were probably more that I just didn't notice. These styles are meant to parody other famous Irish novels and folktales. Unfortunately for me, I haven't read any of the source materials and this layer was lost on me. I read several reviews of the book and the consensus was that if you are intimately familiar with these stories you can really see Flann's genius come through. Oh, well. I guess I need to take their word for it.
I was really hoping that I would like this book. But, my ignorance of the minutiae of Irish folklore and literature kept me from completely immersing myself in the story. I wouldn't recommend this book to anyone unless they could prove to me that they are very familiar with Irish literature.
Tuesday, August 23, 2011
BOOK REPORT: Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte
Title: Jane Eyre
Author: Charlotte Bronte
Original Copyright : 1847
My Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars ( classic )
My Thoughts
A few years ago, I started reading Jane Eyre but didn't finish it. I got about twenty percent through before I had to put it down to focus on other things. Up to that point, Jane Eyre didn't engage me; I found it verbose and dry. Once I was finally able to make enough time to pick up the book again, I didn't have the motivation to re-familiarize myself with the characters and story line As a result, the book sat on the shelf in my bedside table for a long time.
Now, fast-forward to last September when I started up the Olio Scholar project. Jane Eyre was still sitting on the shelf haunting me. I knew that I wanted to finish it. It was too high on most reading lists to be ignored. Too many people I knew listed it as an all-time favorite. I vowed that I would try to read it again as part of the project. However, I saved Jane Eyre until I got close to my goal of 25 books in a year before I picked it up. I figured it would take me a while to push through the approximate five-hundred pages my edition contained and I didn't want to have success hinging on it.
Jane Eyre definitely exceeded my expectations. I was expecting a dry story about a strong woman in a man's world finding love similar to Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen. I expected it to be written in a dry, grammatically correct manner, providing insight into the human psyche with stuffy Victorian wit amid an oppressive social structure. The language was definitely formal but this wasn't the typical uptight British love story. It is about a pious woman who desires a full life, with love simply being one piece. This is one of the reasons that, in 1847, the book was controversial. It was not a woman's place to be unsatisfied with her lot in life. Her role was to marry as well as possible and then do everything she could to ensure the husband was well tended to.
One thing I didn't expect the was the dark, Edgar-Allen Poe like undertones foreshadowed by the rookery looming over Thornfield Hall. I didn't expect the mysterious noises in the attic and unexplained fires. I didn't expect the secrecy of Mr Rochester's staff. I welcomed this dark layer as it added a depth to the story that kept me engaged.
One other thing that I noticed reading Jane Eyre. I now know where J.K. Rowling got her inspiration for Harry Potter's upbringing; the parallels are undeniable. Does this sound familiar? Jane's parents die and as an infant she is left at the door step of her aunt who promises to raise the child as her own, but instead treats her like dirt. The children already in the household are pompous, rude brats who get everything they want and forever torment the new addition to the family. The protagonist orphan is rescued from this domestic hell by going off to boarding school where she make a few friends and excels in her studies. I wonder if the Bronte estate gets any of the money from the Harry Potter series?
I am glad I finished Jane Eyre. It was an excellent book and It is easy to see why it is such a lasting story. It still had its dry parts, don't get me wrong; I said, "Get on with it!" on several occasions but I would recommend this book to anyone who wants a layered, well-written story.
Author: Charlotte Bronte
Original Copyright : 1847
My Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars ( classic )
My Thoughts
A few years ago, I started reading Jane Eyre but didn't finish it. I got about twenty percent through before I had to put it down to focus on other things. Up to that point, Jane Eyre didn't engage me; I found it verbose and dry. Once I was finally able to make enough time to pick up the book again, I didn't have the motivation to re-familiarize myself with the characters and story line As a result, the book sat on the shelf in my bedside table for a long time.
Now, fast-forward to last September when I started up the Olio Scholar project. Jane Eyre was still sitting on the shelf haunting me. I knew that I wanted to finish it. It was too high on most reading lists to be ignored. Too many people I knew listed it as an all-time favorite. I vowed that I would try to read it again as part of the project. However, I saved Jane Eyre until I got close to my goal of 25 books in a year before I picked it up. I figured it would take me a while to push through the approximate five-hundred pages my edition contained and I didn't want to have success hinging on it.
Jane Eyre definitely exceeded my expectations. I was expecting a dry story about a strong woman in a man's world finding love similar to Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen. I expected it to be written in a dry, grammatically correct manner, providing insight into the human psyche with stuffy Victorian wit amid an oppressive social structure. The language was definitely formal but this wasn't the typical uptight British love story. It is about a pious woman who desires a full life, with love simply being one piece. This is one of the reasons that, in 1847, the book was controversial. It was not a woman's place to be unsatisfied with her lot in life. Her role was to marry as well as possible and then do everything she could to ensure the husband was well tended to.
One thing I didn't expect the was the dark, Edgar-Allen Poe like undertones foreshadowed by the rookery looming over Thornfield Hall. I didn't expect the mysterious noises in the attic and unexplained fires. I didn't expect the secrecy of Mr Rochester's staff. I welcomed this dark layer as it added a depth to the story that kept me engaged.
One other thing that I noticed reading Jane Eyre. I now know where J.K. Rowling got her inspiration for Harry Potter's upbringing; the parallels are undeniable. Does this sound familiar? Jane's parents die and as an infant she is left at the door step of her aunt who promises to raise the child as her own, but instead treats her like dirt. The children already in the household are pompous, rude brats who get everything they want and forever torment the new addition to the family. The protagonist orphan is rescued from this domestic hell by going off to boarding school where she make a few friends and excels in her studies. I wonder if the Bronte estate gets any of the money from the Harry Potter series?
I am glad I finished Jane Eyre. It was an excellent book and It is easy to see why it is such a lasting story. It still had its dry parts, don't get me wrong; I said, "Get on with it!" on several occasions but I would recommend this book to anyone who wants a layered, well-written story.
Sunday, July 31, 2011
The World Book Night Reading List
Hi Everyone!
I found a new book list! You know how I love these things; they are a great inspiration for future reading. I stumbled upon this list when I followed a link in twitter posted by Neil Gaiman (@neilhimself on twitter). He was asked to contribute a list of his top-ten books of all time for the 2012 World Book Night event. What I found was a great ever-evolving list of books that readers of all walks of life love.
The list: http://worldbooknight.org/your-books/the-wbn-top-100-books
As of this writing, I've read twenty-nine of the books on the list with ten of them being read during this project. I've read six of the top-ten, and eight of the top-twelve. However, this number might change as more people weigh in with their favorites. It is important to note that this list is again UK centric as that is where the organizer is based so there is a lot of overlap with the "BBC" list I posted earlier.
The project associated with the list is interesting. From the website:
Each copy of the book given out is a special edition. The publishers ask that anyone who reads one of these special versions to send them a note so they can see how the books travel throughout their life. It would be interesting to know if a project like this could take off in the US.
Anyway, take a gander and chime in if you feel like it. I'm still compiling my top-ten books. I will post in the comments when my list is complete. If you have a list, please share it with me!
I found a new book list! You know how I love these things; they are a great inspiration for future reading. I stumbled upon this list when I followed a link in twitter posted by Neil Gaiman (@neilhimself on twitter). He was asked to contribute a list of his top-ten books of all time for the 2012 World Book Night event. What I found was a great ever-evolving list of books that readers of all walks of life love.
The list: http://worldbooknight.org/your-books/the-wbn-top-100-books
As of this writing, I've read twenty-nine of the books on the list with ten of them being read during this project. I've read six of the top-ten, and eight of the top-twelve. However, this number might change as more people weigh in with their favorites. It is important to note that this list is again UK centric as that is where the organizer is based so there is a lot of overlap with the "BBC" list I posted earlier.
The project associated with the list is interesting. From the website:
The first World Book Night was held in the UK in the spring of 2011 and saw 20,000 people give away 1 million specially printed books - 40,000 copies of 25 brilliant titles.
This site exists in order to celebrate books and to connect readers with one another. You can learn more about World Book Night itself, the 2011 books and authors, and connect with other passionate readers.
And most importantly, you can help us shape World Book Night 2012 by telling us your ten favourite books - the books you most love to read, give and share - to give them a chance to be featured in next year's list. Simply sign up or login and tell us what books really matter to you.
Each copy of the book given out is a special edition. The publishers ask that anyone who reads one of these special versions to send them a note so they can see how the books travel throughout their life. It would be interesting to know if a project like this could take off in the US.
Anyway, take a gander and chime in if you feel like it. I'm still compiling my top-ten books. I will post in the comments when my list is complete. If you have a list, please share it with me!
Wednesday, July 20, 2011
BOOK REPORT: Cat's Cradle by Kurt Vonnegut
Title: Cat's Cradle
Author: Kurt Vonnegut
Original Copyright : 1963
My Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars ( clever )
Back-Cover Description
Cat's Cradle is Kurt Vonnegut's satirical commentary on modern man and his madness. An apocolyptic tale of this planet's ultimate fate, it features a midget as the protagonist, a complete, original theology created by a calypso singer, and a vision of the future that is at once blackly fatalistic and hilariously funny. A book that left an indelible mark on the entire generation of readers, Cat's Cradle is one of the twentieth century's most important works -- and Vonnegut at his very best.My Thoughts
Cat's Cradle is a story about the interesting ways people may naively affect the viability of their species long term existence told with the comic absurdity for which Vonnegut is known.
The story revolves around a free-lance writer who is researching the life of a scientist involved with the Manhattan project for a book he was writing about nuclear war. Unbeknownst to all but a few members of his family, the scientist, before he died worked on one last, seemingly innocuous invention. It was never intended as a weapon; the military just wanted a way to keep the marines from getting muddy in the field. The project was never formally pursued, but the scientist, in his curiosity, worked on it during his spare time. This small insignificant invention it turned out, if mishandled, has the ability to destroy the world.
When Cat's Cradle was published in 1963, the cold war was on everyone's mind. It was all but certain that humans would destroy themselves at the hand of a large weapon (read: the Atomic bomb) which was developed solely for the intent of intimidation and destruction. But Cat's Cradle puts forward the idea that the end could be brought on, not by a large explosion, but by something as small as a grain of sand which was developed more out of curiosity than malicious intent. Adding to this plot line, Vonnegut weaves in a new religion called Bokonism which openly states that its canon is based in lies and a small banana republic in the Caribbean which changes governments more often than most people change their socks. All of these layers complement each other very well and they build upon themselves in more and more outlandish ways throughout the book.
Cat's Cradle is a quick read that was extremely clever and funny. I didn't give it 4 stars just because it was such a short read and there were just a few ideas he could have expanded upon. On the whole, my expectations were met and I would recommend this book to most anyone.
On a side note, I need to relay a story which happened whilst reading this book on a flight from Atlanta to San Francisco. First, I read a chapter in Cat's Cradle which chronicled the long twisting path a character follows to the small Caribbean island. One step in his journey, during World War II, he was captured at sea by the Germans and forced to go fight the Partisans in Yugoslavia. This was really weird in that I just finished reading about the Partisan fighters in Yugoslavia in The Forgotten 500. I wouldn't have known who the Partisans were unless I read that book. I thought to myself, "This is neat, two books I've read are connected." Then, about ten minutes later, I decided to take a break from reading and played the in-flight trivia game. One of the questions was, "Which Author invented the religion 'Bokonism'." Then I thought to myself, "Creepy..."
The story revolves around a free-lance writer who is researching the life of a scientist involved with the Manhattan project for a book he was writing about nuclear war. Unbeknownst to all but a few members of his family, the scientist, before he died worked on one last, seemingly innocuous invention. It was never intended as a weapon; the military just wanted a way to keep the marines from getting muddy in the field. The project was never formally pursued, but the scientist, in his curiosity, worked on it during his spare time. This small insignificant invention it turned out, if mishandled, has the ability to destroy the world.
When Cat's Cradle was published in 1963, the cold war was on everyone's mind. It was all but certain that humans would destroy themselves at the hand of a large weapon (read: the Atomic bomb) which was developed solely for the intent of intimidation and destruction. But Cat's Cradle puts forward the idea that the end could be brought on, not by a large explosion, but by something as small as a grain of sand which was developed more out of curiosity than malicious intent. Adding to this plot line, Vonnegut weaves in a new religion called Bokonism which openly states that its canon is based in lies and a small banana republic in the Caribbean which changes governments more often than most people change their socks. All of these layers complement each other very well and they build upon themselves in more and more outlandish ways throughout the book.
Cat's Cradle is a quick read that was extremely clever and funny. I didn't give it 4 stars just because it was such a short read and there were just a few ideas he could have expanded upon. On the whole, my expectations were met and I would recommend this book to most anyone.
On a side note, I need to relay a story which happened whilst reading this book on a flight from Atlanta to San Francisco. First, I read a chapter in Cat's Cradle which chronicled the long twisting path a character follows to the small Caribbean island. One step in his journey, during World War II, he was captured at sea by the Germans and forced to go fight the Partisans in Yugoslavia. This was really weird in that I just finished reading about the Partisan fighters in Yugoslavia in The Forgotten 500. I wouldn't have known who the Partisans were unless I read that book. I thought to myself, "This is neat, two books I've read are connected." Then, about ten minutes later, I decided to take a break from reading and played the in-flight trivia game. One of the questions was, "Which Author invented the religion 'Bokonism'." Then I thought to myself, "Creepy..."
Saturday, July 9, 2011
BOOK REPORT: The Forgotten 500 by Gregory A. Freeman
Title: The Forgotten 500
Author: Gregory A. Freeman
Original Copyright : 2007
My Rating: 4 out of 5 stars ( fascinating )
Back-Cover Description
The Forgotten 500: The Untold Story of the Men Who Risked All For the Greatest Rescue Mission of World War II
Here is the astonishing never-before-told story of the greatest rescue mission of World War II -- When the OSS set out to recover more than five hundred airmen trapped behind enemy lines in Yugoslavia
During a bombing campaign over Romanian oil fields, hundreds of American airmen were shot down in Nazi-occupied Yugoslavia. Local Serbian farmers and peasants risked their own lives to give refuge to the soldiers while they waited for rescue, and in 1944, Operation Halyard was born. The risks were incredible. The starving Americans in Yugoslavia had to construct a landing strip large enough for C-47 cargo planes--without tools, without alerting the Germans, and without endangering the villagers. And the cargo planes had to make it through enemy airspace and back without getting shot down themselves.
Suppressed for more than half a century for political reasons, the full account of this unforgettable story of loyalty, self-sacrifice, and bravery is now being told for the first time ever. The Forgotten 500 is the gripping behind-the-scenes look at the greatest escape of World War II.
My Thoughts
Shortly after the beginning of World War II, the royal family of Yugoslavia was forced to flee the country when the Nazi's took over in 1941. The resistance movement which rallied together to fight this invasion fractured into two parties quickly afterwards. The Pro-Royal Serbs under the guidance of General Milhailovich (the Chetnik's), and the Pro-Communist ( Partisans) under General Tito already looked past the German occupation to the new post-war government. By the middle of the war, the two sides took to fighting each other just as much as the Germans.
The Forgotten 500 is a fascinating view into the logistical nightmare of a daring rescue mission to bring home hundreds of airmen in Nazi occupied mountainous terrain of politically unstable Yugoslavia.
The book is roughly divided into four main parts. The beginning section gives the personal stories of several of the airmen who chose to fly a slow, behemoth of a plane across enemy territory. It was interesting to learn what motivated and drove them to become pilots, tail gunners or the most dangerous of them all, the ball turret gunner. These brave men along with hundreds of others were tasked with bombing a major oil field in Romania and couldn't quite make it home.
The second part tells the stories of the airmen post-bailout in the mountains of the what is now Serbia. The Chetniks saw the American soldiers as liberators and welcomed them with open arms. They did everything they could to protect them, often at the risk of their own lives. This section also outlines the back-story of the OSS, the predecessors to the CIA, and the people responsible for Operation Halyard. One of the more interesting stories in this section is about the OSS officer who was the son of Yugoslavian immigrants; he was responsible for organizing the rescue mission. For those who may decide to read this book, I won't spoil his interesting and serendipitous journey into the OSS, but I will tell you that someone who has that many close calls and chance meetings must be living right.
The third section goes into details about not only the Chetnik/Partisan conflict, but of the politics of allied British and American forces working "together" in the area fighting the Germans. This was by far the most intriguing section of the book. The British were technically the lead force fighting the Germans in Yugoslavia. The Americans were helping where they could but got their direction from good man Churchill. The problem with this was that there was a communist double agent feeding the British misinformation. The double-agent was saying that Milhailovich was secretly aiding the Germans and the Allies needed to support General Tito to make any progress in the area. A rescue couldn't be attempted without British consent and they did everything they could to stall and hinder the mission as they saw it as aiding the enemy.
The final section is the aftermath of the rescue. The troops were told to keep quiet about the rescue mission just in case any future rescues needed to be performed. However, when the war did end, the American soldiers were directed to not openly acknowledge the support given by Mihailovich for fear of upsetting the newly communist Yugoslavia, which was supported by the Russians. Shortly thereafter, Mihailovich was executed for war crimes. The role Mihailovich played in the resistance movement is still a contentious issue today and the many of the same dividing lines drawn in the sand during World War II were still fighting through the war in the Balkans during the 1990's which ended with the creation of Bosnia-Herzogovinia, Serbia, Croatia, and Montenegro.
The Forgotten 500 was very well written and thoroughly researched book which I would recommend to anyone who has an interest in non-fiction accounts of World-War II or military covert operations.
The Forgotten 500 is a fascinating view into the logistical nightmare of a daring rescue mission to bring home hundreds of airmen in Nazi occupied mountainous terrain of politically unstable Yugoslavia.
The book is roughly divided into four main parts. The beginning section gives the personal stories of several of the airmen who chose to fly a slow, behemoth of a plane across enemy territory. It was interesting to learn what motivated and drove them to become pilots, tail gunners or the most dangerous of them all, the ball turret gunner. These brave men along with hundreds of others were tasked with bombing a major oil field in Romania and couldn't quite make it home.
The second part tells the stories of the airmen post-bailout in the mountains of the what is now Serbia. The Chetniks saw the American soldiers as liberators and welcomed them with open arms. They did everything they could to protect them, often at the risk of their own lives. This section also outlines the back-story of the OSS, the predecessors to the CIA, and the people responsible for Operation Halyard. One of the more interesting stories in this section is about the OSS officer who was the son of Yugoslavian immigrants; he was responsible for organizing the rescue mission. For those who may decide to read this book, I won't spoil his interesting and serendipitous journey into the OSS, but I will tell you that someone who has that many close calls and chance meetings must be living right.
The third section goes into details about not only the Chetnik/Partisan conflict, but of the politics of allied British and American forces working "together" in the area fighting the Germans. This was by far the most intriguing section of the book. The British were technically the lead force fighting the Germans in Yugoslavia. The Americans were helping where they could but got their direction from good man Churchill. The problem with this was that there was a communist double agent feeding the British misinformation. The double-agent was saying that Milhailovich was secretly aiding the Germans and the Allies needed to support General Tito to make any progress in the area. A rescue couldn't be attempted without British consent and they did everything they could to stall and hinder the mission as they saw it as aiding the enemy.
The final section is the aftermath of the rescue. The troops were told to keep quiet about the rescue mission just in case any future rescues needed to be performed. However, when the war did end, the American soldiers were directed to not openly acknowledge the support given by Mihailovich for fear of upsetting the newly communist Yugoslavia, which was supported by the Russians. Shortly thereafter, Mihailovich was executed for war crimes. The role Mihailovich played in the resistance movement is still a contentious issue today and the many of the same dividing lines drawn in the sand during World War II were still fighting through the war in the Balkans during the 1990's which ended with the creation of Bosnia-Herzogovinia, Serbia, Croatia, and Montenegro.
The Forgotten 500 was very well written and thoroughly researched book which I would recommend to anyone who has an interest in non-fiction accounts of World-War II or military covert operations.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





